Legal Opinion

Timmons v. Starkey

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 30, 2010No. 26874PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pleicones

We granted certiorari to review a Court of Appeals decision reversing a circuit court order which had denied respondent’s (UBS) request for arbitration of petitioner’s claims. Timmons v. Starkey, 380 S.C. 590, 671 S.E.2d 101 (Ct.App.2008). We affirm.

FACTS

In 1995, petitioner executed a durable power of attorney naming her daughter, defendant Starkey, as her attorney-in-fact. In 1996, petitioner opened an investment account with *377J.C. Bradford & Co. (Bradford). In June 2004, the power of attorney was properly recorded. UBS became the successor-in-interest to Bradford, and in September 2004,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Aiken v. World Finance Corp. of SCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  2. Partain v. Upstate Automotive GroupSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  3. Timmons Ex Rel. Timmons v. StarkeyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Parsons v. John Wieland Homes & Neighborhoods of the Carolinas, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2016
  2. Parsons v. John Wieland HomesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2016
  3. Parsons v. John Wieland Homes & Neighborhoods of the Carolinas, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2016
  4. Parsons v. John Wieland Homes & Neighborhoods of the Carolinas, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2016
  5. Timmons v. StarkeySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API