Legal Opinion

Curtis v. Faulkner University

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 1, 1991No. 89-233, 89-249PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiffs appeal from a judgment granting defendant Faulkner University ("Faulkner") a new trial following the return of jury verdicts in the plaintiffs' favor. The plaintiffs are former students of Faulkner. Faulkner cross-appeals, challenging the trial court's denial of its motions for directed verdict and j.n.o.v.

Although it denied Faulkner's motion for j.n.o.v., the court granted its subsequent motion for a new trial and listed five reasons for doing so: (1) that the verdicts failed to do justice between the parties; (2) that the verdicts were so varying that it was apparent that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jawad v. GranadeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  2. Casey v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  3. Land & Associates, Inc. v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  4. Kane v. Edward J. Woerner & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  5. Honeywell, Inc. v. Bel Air Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Cottrell v. NAT. COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASS'NSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  2. Slack v. StreamSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  3. Victor Deng and DM Technology & Energy, Inc. v. Clarence "Buddy" Scoggins and Complete Lighting Source, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2014
  4. Beauchamp v. COASTAL BOAT STORAGE, LLCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  5. Scott v. FarnellSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API