Legal Opinion

Tully v. Mandell

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 27, 1929PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSanderson, J.

This is an action of tort to recover damages from a dentist for personal injuries, alleged to have been suffered by the plaintiff because of the breaking of a hypodermic needle used for the purpose of anesthesia preparatory to the extraction of a tooth. It was admitted that the needle broke when inserted in the plaintiff’s jaw by the defendant.

The plaintiff introduced testimony tending to prove that the defendant said immediately after the occurrence that he did not know how it could have happened, that it was all his fault and not to worry about it, that he would take care of everything. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hawkes v. LackeyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  2. Barnett v. RobertsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  3. Zandan v. RadnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  4. Conant v. EvansMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  5. Leary v. KeithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Woronka v. SewallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  2. Plumer v. LuceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  3. Collins v. BaronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  4. Quickstad v. TavennerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  5. Brown v. Metropolitan Transit AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API