Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee

District Court, N.D. California

Decided May 13, 2022No. 3:19-cv-04618Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WINSTON R. ANDERSON, et al., Case No. 19-cv-04618-VC Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ v. MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS INTEL CORPORATION INVESTMENT POLICY COMMITTEE, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 163 Defendants. The only cause of action remaining in this case is Anderson’s claim that the Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee violated ERISA by failing to timely provide documents upon his request. See Dkt. No. 147 (dismissing Counts I–VI). ERISA mandates that the administrator of an employee benefit plan “shall, upon…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. John R. Stone v. The Travelers CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. Gilberto Rivera, Nicholas Alberto, Luis Navarro, Jose Garcia, Hector Garcia, Pablo Galindo, Socorro Mendivil, Rogelio Casares v. Joe AnayaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  5. Brown v. Rawlings Financial Services, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API