Legal Opinion

Kratovil v. Thieda

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 13, 1965No. Gen. No. 50,272PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kluczynski

Plaintiff, William E. Kratovil, brought suit against defendants Walter A. Thieda and his wife Jean, charging that they, on July 3, 1956, had made and delivered to him a promissory installment note (described as exhibit one and by reference made part of the complaint) ; that $1,372 had been paid on installments applying to principal and interest thereon; that there remained unpaid the sum of $2,478 and according to its terms this balance was now due and payable to plaintiff, the holder and owner thereof.

Exhibit 1 was a promissory installment note, executed by defendants and one Edward T.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Grove v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1960

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Becovic v. Harris Trust & Savings BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  2. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. American National Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1968
  3. Kratovil v. ThiedaIllinois Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API