In Re Perrello
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtArterburn, C.J.
This proceeding was instituted by a Verified Complaint for Disciplinary Action filed by the Disciplinary Commission of this Court. It was heard before the Honorable Jack A. King as a Hearing Officer. After the hearing the following Findings and Recommendations of Hearing Officer were filed:
Findings of Fact
1. The Respondent is an attorney heretofore admitted to the practice of law. [Disciplinary Commission Exhibits 1 and 2].
2. The Respondent has been duly notified, as required by A.D. Rule 23, §§ 10, 11, 12, and 14, with respect to each grievance or complaint upon which any specific finding of…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Matter of PerrelloIndiana Supreme Court · 1979