Legal Opinion

Hazelbaker v. Reber

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 12, 1927No. 27,214PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

This appeal presents the question whether the spouses of tenants in common of real property are necessary parties in an action to partition it.

It appears that the parties to this proceeding are Mary Hazel-baker, Ina Reber, Cornelius Reynolds and George W. Reynolds, and that they are tenants in common of a tract of land in Linn county. It does not appear (and it is immaterial) whether their common ownership and title vested by deed or by inheritance. Mary and Ina are married women and their husbands are living. Mary, as plaintiff, brought the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Busenbark v. BusenbarkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  2. Haggerty v. WagnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Hamblin v. MarchantSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  4. Putnam v. PutnamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  5. Flanigan v. WatersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1896

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cole v. CoonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  2. Lowe v. PattersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  3. Turner v. TurnerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1910
  4. Barnes v. BarnesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  5. Henslee v. HerringSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API