Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gervasi v. Peay

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 22, 1998Published

1DissentRubin, J.

A violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1104 is a statutory predicate for a cause of action by a fellow police officer under General Municipal Law § 205-e, as this Court recently recognized in Gonzalez v Iocovello (249 AD2d 143). To be entitled to summary judgment dismissing the complaint, a municipal defendant is required to demonstrate that the conduct of its employee is not reckless as a matter of law (Saarinen v Kerr, 84 NY2d 494, 503). Therefore, the defendant must establish that there is no reasonable view of the evidence by which a trier of fact could conclude that the operator of an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Szczerbiak v. PilatNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Saarinen v. KerrNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Campbell v. City of ElmiraNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Gonzalez v. IocovelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API