Legal Opinion
128 Central Park South Associates v. Cooney
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided July 1, 1983PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Edward H. Lehner, J.
The sole issue before the court in the proceeding, which was submitted on an agreed statement of facts, is whether a 6- by 15-foot room at 128 Central Park South is subject to the Rent Stabilization Law (Administrative Code of City of New York, § YY51-1.0 et seq. [RSL]) when the unit may not be a legal dwelling unit under the City Housing Maintenance Code (Administrative Code, tit D, ch 26, § D26-1.01 et seq.).
FACTS
Under a prior lease the subject room (referred to therein as a maid’s room) was rented to another tenant for storage purposes. In June, 1978…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mandel v. PitkowskyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1979
- Mandel v. PitkowskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- La Guardia v. CavanaughNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Tehan v. Thos. C. Peters Printing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
3Cited by3 opinions
- 10 West 66th Street Corp. v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Kace Realty Co. v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalNew York Supreme Court · 1988
- Gracecor Realty Co. v. HargroveAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1994