Carbonelli v. City of Amsterdam
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant, City of Amsterdam, from a judgment of .the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Montgomery on the 24th day of January, 1921, upon the decision of the court rendered after a trial at Chambers, a jury having been waived.
1Opinion of the Court
Kiley, J.:
The plaintiff by ample evidence sustained all of the allegations of her complaint upon the trial of this action, viz.: That by chapter 123 of the Laws of 1813 the Amsterdam Bridge Company was incorporated; that the purpose was to build a bridge over the Mohawk river between the towns of Amsterdam and Florida in the county of Montgomery, and said corporation was authorized and empowered to purchase or condemn lands necessary for the construction of said bridge and the approaches thereto. The said corporation as a source of revenue was authorized to construct a tollgate and house on…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mayor, Etc., of N.Y. v. . StarinNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Edwards v. FordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
3Cited by2 opinions
- Guimond v. Village of KeesevilleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Guimond v. Village of KeesevilleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014