Legal Opinion

Quick v. Samp

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 2005No. NonePublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZINTER, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Russ J. Quick and ZR Consulting, Inc. brought this malpractice action against their former attorney, John Burke. The malpractice allegedly occurred during Burke’s representation of Quick in a prior suit against a third-party. Quick alleged malpractice on two theories: (1) attorney negligence in preparation of the complaint; and, (2) fraud in Burke’s preparation of a forged document that was used to correct a problem caused by the defective complaint. In this action, Burke’s Personal Representative 1 moved for summary judgment alleging that Quick was in pari delic-to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Degen v. BaymanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Evans v. CameronWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  3. First Premier Bank v. Kolcraft Enterprises, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Clemens v. ClemensWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Leafgreen v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Alberts v. Tuft (In Re Greater Southeast Community Hospital Corp. I)District Court, District of Columbia · 2006
  2. Ferebee v. HobartSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Cowan Bros., L.L.C. v. American State BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Hanna v. LandsmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API