Legal Opinion
Allen v. De Nyse
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 4, 1901Published
Appeal from trial term, New York county. Action by David Allen and another against Nicholas H. De Nyse and another. Prom a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtMcLAUGHUN, J.
This action was brought to recover damages alleged to have been sustained for the breach of the conditions of a bond, which reads as follows:
“Know all men by these presents that we, Harriet P. De Nyse and Nicholas H. De Nyse, both of 292a 17th St., Brooklyn, N. Y., are held and firmly bound unto Allen & Co., cigar manufacturers, of 2607 3d Ave., borough of the Bronx, city, county, and state of New York, -in the sum of one thousand ($1,000.00) dollars, lawful money of the United States of America, to be paid to the said Allen & Co., their executors, administrators, or assigns, for which…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Reed v. . McConnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Clason v. MorrisCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1812
- Truesdell v. . SarlesNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Kirwin v. MaloneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- Tilden v. WashburnThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1889