Legal Opinion

Pirtle v. Tucker

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 15, 2006No. 1050907PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

Melissa Dawn Pirtle and Anna Dell Prchal, contestants in a will contest involving a document purported to be the will of their grandfather, James F. Miller, appeal from the summary judgment entered in favor of the proponent and sole beneficiary of the will, John Wayne Tucker. Pirtle and Prchal contend that the will was the product of Tucker's undue influence over Miller, that Miller lacked testamentary capacity, and that the will was, for those and for additional…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Ex Parte HelmsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  4. Turner v. Westhampton Court, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  5. Knox v. KnoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McGee v. McGeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 2012
  2. McGimsey v. GraySupreme Court of Alabama · 2018
  3. Richard Boyken Tyson v. Cole Scott Harbin and Carson Ray Harbin (Appeal from Lauderdale Circuit Court: CV-20-900205).Supreme Court of Alabama · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API