Legal Opinion

McCraney v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 13, 2009No. Civil Action No. 2009-0687Published

1Opinion of the Court

FILED APR 1 3 2009 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NANCY MAYER WHITTINGTON, CLERK FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA U.S. DISTRICT COURT KAREEM X. McCRANEY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 09 U687 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on initial consideration ofplaintiffs application to proceed in forma pauperis and pro se complaint. The application will be granted, and the complaint will be dismissed. When plaintiff was 17 years of age, under the so-called "direct filing" provision, the United States Attorney for the District of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Fleming v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1994
  3. Diana Kearny Powell v. Nicholas Katzenbach, United States Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
  4. United States v. Jerome T. BlandCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  5. Partlow v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API