Legal Opinion

Crosbie v. Westinghouse Elevator Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 26, 1982No. 165 and 276PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellants contend that the lower court erred in granting appellee a new trial limited to damages. We agree and, accordingly, reverse the order of the lower court and reinstate the jury verdict.

Appellee brought this action against the manufacturer and the servicing company of an elevator, alleging that she had been injured when the elevator plummeted two floors and abruptly stopped, hurling her to its floor. Following a lengthy trial, the jury returned a $17,500 verdict against both appellants. Appellee filed post-trial motions alleging, inter alia, that the jury award was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Karcesky v. LariaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Tagnani v. LewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Gilligan v. ShawSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Kralik v. CromwellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Tyus v. RestaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Simmons v. St. Clair Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Wilkerson v. Allied Van Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Butler v. DeLucaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Loos & Dilworth v. Quaker State Oil Refining Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API