Legal Opinion
Drew v. Ridley
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided October 14, 1993No. 92-SP-340PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FERREN, Associate Judge:
On August 26,1991, appellant filed a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus in the Superior Court pursuant to D.C.Code § 16-1901 (1989). He has challenged both the validity of the United States Parole Commission’s transfer of authority over appellant’s parole from a federal District Court sentence to the District of Columbia Board of Parole and that Board’s subsequent actions. On January 17, 1992, the court entered an order to show cause why the writ should not issue. A response was filed on February 11, 1992, and the court denied appellant’s petition on February…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lane v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- King v. KiddDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Customers Parking, Inc. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Capitol Hill Hospital v. District of Columbia State Health Planning & Development AgencyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Council of School Officers v. VaughnDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wilson v. Office of the Chairperson, District of Columbia Board of ParoleDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1995
- Perkins v. HendersonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1995
- Hill v. District of Columbia Board of ParoleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000