Legal Opinion
Willie Brumley v. Curtis Wingard
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided October 11, 2001No. 00-3515PublishedCited by 152 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J., joined by Cole, J.,
ROSEN, D.J. (pp. 647-72), delivered a separate dissenting opinion.
OPINION
MOORE, Circuit Judge.
In this habeas case, Warden Curtis Win-gard (hereinafter “the State”) appeals an *633order denying post-judgment relief from the district court’s order granting habeas petitioner Willie Brumley relief and directing the State to retry Brumley for complicity to commit aggravated murder. We AFFIRM the district court’s denial of the State’s post-judgment motion. We hold that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the State’s motion for post-judgment relief because the district court had…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Sumner v. MataSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by152 opinions
- Richard Bugh v. Betty Mitchell, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Willie Williams, Jr. v. Margaret Bagley, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Eric W. Taylor v. Pamela WithrowCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Vasquez v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Lovett v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
147 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.