Legal Opinion

Adams v. Johnson

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1854PublishedCited by 7 opinions

This cause was heard before J. M. Wilson, Judge,, at February term, 1854, of Cook County Court of Common Pleas. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appealed. The facts of the case sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtCaton, J.

The note upon which this suit was brought was given for one of Wood’s patent shingle machines, and the assignment of the right to make, use, and vend the machines within certain districts. Two grounds of defence were relied upon at the trial. First, a warranty, and that the machine did not answer the warranty, and, second, fraudulent representations made by the vendor at the time of the sale of the machine and transfer of the right. We have carefully examined the instructions, and in them find no error. The case seems to have been fairly put to the jury, who found the issues joined for the…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kenner v. HardingIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  2. McCormick v. KellySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  3. VanHorn v. StautzIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Hanson v. BusseIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Roberts v. ApplegateIllinois Supreme Court · 1894

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API