Legal Opinion

Murray v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1997No. 26075; No. 26653; No. 26672PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*13OPINION

2Per curiam

These appeals have been consolidated for the purpose of this opinion. We conclude that in each case the State violated the appellants’ Fifth Amendment rights. We therefore reverse and remand each case for a new trial.

FACTS

MURRAY v. STATE

On March 13, 1987, Paul Eugene Dudley was murdered in the parking lot of a North Las Vegas casino. His partly burned body was found several days later in the desert. Appellant Steven Murray and chief prosecution witness Melanie Chapman were present at the murder. At Murray’s trial, each accused the other of the act. Murray was originally charged with…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Jenkins v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Emmons v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Coleman v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. Byford v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Dettloff v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Byford v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Chavez-Juarez v. RussellDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2021
  5. Miyayama v. HosodaDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API