Legal Opinion

Rocheleau v. Consolidated Water Power & Paper Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1926PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed January 12, 1926:

Eschweiler, J.(1) Appellants claim that by the language used in the stipulation and order thereon, referred to in the statement of facts, the defendant was foreclosed from disputing that there was a taking of petitioners’ land under the condemnation statutes and that there was properly before the court solely the questions of compensation for and the damages consequent upon a taking. Some of the recitals in the stipulation and order and quoted above, if considered alone, might well support such a claim under the ruling in Fritz v. Southern Wis.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co. v. BeckerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Thompson v. Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
  3. McCord v. SylvesterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Fritz v. Southern Wisconsin Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Benka v. Consolidated Water Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API