Rocheleau v. Consolidated Water Power & Paper Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed January 12, 1926:
Eschweiler, J.(1) Appellants claim that by the language used in the stipulation and order thereon, referred to in the statement of facts, the defendant was foreclosed from disputing that there was a taking of petitioners’ land under the condemnation statutes and that there was properly before the court solely the questions of compensation for and the damages consequent upon a taking. Some of the recitals in the stipulation and order and quoted above, if considered alone, might well support such a claim under the ruling in Fritz v. Southern Wis.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co. v. BeckerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
- Thompson v. Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
- McCord v. SylvesterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
- Fritz v. Southern Wisconsin Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
3Cited by1 opinion
- Benka v. Consolidated Water Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1929