American Plan Corp. v. Beckham
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Jordan, Presiding Judge.
In this common law claim against American Plan Corporation, in the nature of an action for malicious use of civil process commenced in Fulton Superior Court in May, 1970, the defendant appeals the denial of a summary judgment. Held:
1. It is settled law that for a defendant to prevail as the movant for summary judgment the undisputed facts as disclosed by the pleadings and proof must negate some essential element of the plaintiff’s claim, thereby entitling the defendant to judgment as a matter of law. Mion Constr. Co. v. Rutledge, 123 Ga. App. 777 (182 SE2d 500); Taylor…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hicks v. BrantleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Georgia Veneer & Package Co. v. Florida National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Hearn v. BatchelorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- Morgan v. MizeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Gregory v. Star Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Waldrep v. GoodwinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
- Lane Co. v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Scheer v. CliattCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Kviten v. NashCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Barber v. H & H Muller Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.