Legal Opinion
Adams v. Burkowski
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 1, 1978No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and motion granted. Memorandum: In this action for damages for personal injuries, Special Term’s denial of plaintiffs motion for leave to serve a supplemental bill of particulars was an improvident exercise of discretion. "Leave to serve an amended bill of particulars, in the absence of a showing of prejudice, should be freely granted.” (Portilla v Boyke, 51 AD2d 539, citing CPLR 3025, subd [b] and 3 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac, par 3041.21; see, also, Cossart v Fredenburgh, 50 AD2d 993; Kerlin v Green, 36 AD2d 892.) Here, affidavits…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gardner v. Fyr-Fyter Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Portilla v. BoykeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Smith v. University of Rochester Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
- Bernas v. KepnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
- Cossart v. PredenburghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
3Cited by2 opinions
- Titsworth v. MondoNew York Supreme Court · 1978
- Best v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982