Legal Opinion

Cornelious v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 1927No. 7 Div. 337Published

1Opinion of the Court

SAMFORD, J.,

Section 3446 of the Code of 1923 applies alone to monuments, posts, or trees as the same refers to the boundaries of land. As used in this section, “monument,” “post,” and “tree” are used synonymously.

When relating to land a “monument” is some tangible landmark established to indicate a boundary. 9 Corpus Juris, 160. At the common law there was no criminal liability for removing a landmark. Robinson v. State, 7 Ala. App. 172, 62 So. 303.

Where statutes have been passed fixing a penalty for removing or destroying boundary marks, monuments, etc., they refer to and apply only to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stratton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Robinson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. Ruth v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1864
  4. Ramsey v. MorrowCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API