State v. Tadeo-Mares
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
Leonel Tadeo-Mares challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction for possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver, RCW 69.50.401(a). He argues the State failed to prove he constructively possessed the cocaine. We affirm.
In September and October 1994, Detective David Ponozzo and other members of the Interagency Narcotics Enforcement Team (INET) were investigating drug activity at 512 North Grape, Apartment 7A, in Moses Lake. In addition to keeping the apartment under surveillance, the team used a confidential informant to make controlled drug purchases at…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. GentryWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. PartinWashington Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
- State v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. SummersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- State v. SummersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- State v. AlvarezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- State v. AlvarezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.