Carlos Lowe v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BERNICE BOUIE DONALD, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner-appellant Carlos Lowe appeals the district court's denial of his successive pro se motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. For the reasons more fully explained below, we REVERSE and REMAND the case back to the district court.
I
In 2005, a jury found Lowe guilty of possessing ammunition as a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Lowe had previously been convicted of four felonies under Tennessee law. They include: third-degree burglary, aggravated assault, a rape occurring in 1977, and a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. James Clark, IIICourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
- United States v. Tyren CervenakCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025
- Altin Shuti v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Ervin v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2020
- Franklin McGee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.