Legal Opinion

Carlos Lowe v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 4, 2019No. 17-5490PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERNICE BOUIE DONALD, Circuit Judge.

Petitioner-appellant Carlos Lowe appeals the district court's denial of his successive pro se motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. For the reasons more fully explained below, we REVERSE and REMAND the case back to the district court.

I

In 2005, a jury found Lowe guilty of possessing ammunition as a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Lowe had previously been convicted of four felonies under Tennessee law. They include: third-degree burglary, aggravated assault, a rape occurring in 1977, and a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  2. Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. James Clark, IIICourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
  2. United States v. Tyren CervenakCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025
  3. Altin Shuti v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  4. Ervin v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2020
  5. Franklin McGee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API