Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State v. Windsor

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1985No. 15486Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBistline, Justice

The opinion for the Court which has been authored by Justice Donaldson is neatly compartmented into nine issues. To facilitate my independent examination of those issues and the independent review which will be made by the trial bench and bar, I have prepared the following table of contents, following the Court’s listing of the issues as I through IX:

I Windsor was not coerced into giving a confession. Based on the totality of the circumstances, there is sufficient evidence introduced which reveals that Windsor’s confession was voluntarily made. It is therefore admissible, pp. 1186-1187.

IIThe…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Enmund v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API