Legal Opinion

Domine v. State

New York Court of Claims

Decided March 8, 1956No. Claim No. 32507; Claim No. 31892; Claim No. 32306; Claim No. 32307; Claim No. 32336; Claim No. 31748; Claim No. 31749; Claim No. 31750Published

1Opinion of the CourtRyan, P. J.

These claims are not related to each other except as the groupings under the motion numbers hereinabove assigned indicate. Each motion is an application to restore the claim, or the group of claims, designated to the trial calendar. Because the motions have a common denominator we discuss them in a single memorandum.

Each claim was dismissed at the opening of the September, 1955, Albany Term of this court “ for lack of prosecution ”. Actually the dismissal was a matter of calendar practice under rule 7 of the Rules of the Court of Claims there being a failure, in each instance, and on behalf…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Allen v. FinkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  2. Rothschild v. HavilandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  3. Fitzgerald Manufacturing Co. v. AlexanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  4. Calagna v. GreenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  5. Industrial Bank of Schenectady v. JackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API