Legal Opinion
Cambridge Mutual Fire Insurance Company A/S/O David Krug v. Stihl, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 12, 2026No. 2:22-cv-05893Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAMBRIDGE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY A/S/O DAVID Civil Action No. 22-5893 (JXN)(MAH) KRUG, Plaintiff, OPINION v. STIHL, INC., Defendant. NEALS, District Judge Before the Court are Defendant STIHL Incorporated’s (“STIHL”) motions: (1) to exclude Plaintiff Cambridge Mutual Fire Insurance Company (“Cambridge”) a/s/o David Krug’s (“Krug”) (collectively, “Plaintiff”) expert Larry Wharton’s (“Wharton”) opinions pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence1 702 (ECF No. 79)2; (2) to exclude Wharton’s manufacturing defect opinion pursuant to Federal Rule…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Williams v. Borough of West ChesterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Hopkins v. Fox & Lazo RealtorsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Vera L. POLLOCK, Appellant, v. AMERICAN TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH LONG LINESCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Siegel Transfer, Inc. v. Carrier Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.