Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Van Jones

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided October 8, 1981PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPerretta, J.

The defendant was put to trial on an indictment charging him with unarmed robbery by assault and putting in fear.1 G. L. c. 265, § 19. After closing arguments of counsel, the judge amended the indictment to conform to the evidence of unarmed robbery by force and violence. Mass.R.Crim.P. 4(d), 378 Mass. 849 (1979) (“Upon his own motion or the written motion of either party, a judge may allow amendment of the form of a complaint or indictment if such amendment would not prejudice the defendant or the Commonwealth”). He instructed the jury *490on the elements of the offense set out in the indictment…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JonesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  2. Commonwealth v. NovickiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  3. Commonwealth v. BenjaminMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  4. Commonwealth v. ParrottaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  5. Commonwealth v. GrassoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DunnMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
  2. United States v. Starks, Jr.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
  3. Commonwealth v. GeislerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
  4. Commonwealth v. SayaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
  5. Commonwealth v. LaFrennieMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API