Legal Opinion

Ray v. Pan American Petroleum Corp.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 17, 1929PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

1. “Since questions of negligence, including contributory negligence, lie peculiarly within the province of the jury, they can not, except in plain and indisputable eases, be determined otherwise.” Sherrod v. A., B. & A. Ry. Co., 27 Ga. App. 510 (2) (108 S. E. 908) ; Larkin v. Andrews, 27 Ga. App. 685 (109 S. E. 518).

2. This being a suit for personal injuries received by the plaintiff in stepping backward and off the running board of his automobile, which was a “closed” car, without knowledge that it had been elevated, when in fact it had been lifted by a hoisting machine at the defendants’…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Larkin v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  2. Sherrod v. Atlanta, Birmingham & Atlantic Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1921

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Angel v. McKales, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Jones v. Rickard & Davis, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Bisping v. Kummer Auto Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API