Legal Opinion

Martin v. Commonwealth

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1978PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, Justice.

William Earl Martin and George T. Che-nault were each indicted on a charge of first-degree burglary. KRS 511.020. A second count of the indictment charged Chenault as a persistent felony offender. KRS 532.080. The jury returned verdicts finding both of them guilty of first-degree burglary. It fixed Martin’s punishment at 20 years’ imprisonment, and Chenault’s sentence at 10 years’ imprisonment. On a second stage of a bifurcated proceeding on the persistent felony offense the jury found Chenault guilty and his sentence was enhanced to a term of 25 years’ imprisonment. Judgment…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Trimble v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1969
  2. Harris v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1965
  3. Newton v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1977

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Beck v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Robert A. Prather v. John Rees, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  3. Miller v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Reed v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Bartley v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2013

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API