Martin v. Commonwealth
Kentucky Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
JONES, Justice.
William Earl Martin and George T. Che-nault were each indicted on a charge of first-degree burglary. KRS 511.020. A second count of the indictment charged Chenault as a persistent felony offender. KRS 532.080. The jury returned verdicts finding both of them guilty of first-degree burglary. It fixed Martin’s punishment at 20 years’ imprisonment, and Chenault’s sentence at 10 years’ imprisonment. On a second stage of a bifurcated proceeding on the persistent felony offense the jury found Chenault guilty and his sentence was enhanced to a term of 25 years’ imprisonment. Judgment…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Trimble v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1969
- Harris v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1965
- Newton v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1977
3Cited by39 opinions
- Beck v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Robert A. Prather v. John Rees, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Miller v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2009
- Reed v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1987
- Bartley v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2013
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.