Wilbanks v. State

CATES, Judge.

February 9, 1970 this appeal was sent us by the Supreme Court after that court per curiam reversed the judgment of the former Court of Appeals (5th Div. 648, mss. June 25, 1968, 48 Ala.App. 540, 266 So.2d 609):

“We hold, therefore, that the Court of Appeals erred in holding that the trial court erred in refusing the request of counsel for the defendant to interrupt the direct examination of the witness Holley in order to examine him on ‘voir dire.’ ”

We shall take up the other claims of error and also review as we must (Code 1940, T. 15, § 389) all rulings of the trial judge which…