Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Norman v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 1982No. 81-1774PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClifford F. Brown, J.

It is well established that the determination of factual situations is within the final jurisdiction of the Industrial Commission, and subject to correction by action in mandamus only upon a showing of abuse of discretion. State, ex rel. G F Business Equip., v. Indus. Comm. (1981), 66 Ohio St. 2d 446, 447 [20 O.O.3d 379, 380]. Accordingly, the reports of the four examining physicians must be analyzed to determine whether they support or contradict the decision of the commission.

Dr. DiMauro, who was Mrs. Norman’s treating physician, originally examined her on September 28, 1978, and found that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Anderson v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State ex rel. G F Business Equipment, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Thompson v. Fenix & Scisson, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State ex rel. Woodard v. Frigidaire Division, General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State ex rel. Kirk v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State ex rel. Koonce v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State ex rel. Berry v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API