Legal Opinion
Scott v. Machinists Automotive Trades District No. 190
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 8, 1987No. Nos. 86-1620, 86-1621, 86-1625, 86-1626PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed April 27, 1987, is withdrawn. The attached opinion is filed in its stead.
OPINION
2Per curiam
Scott filed suits in both state and federal court alleging five causes of action arising from termination of his employment by Safeway and related allegations of harassment by his supervisor, Morales. Three of the causes of action, although two were pleaded on theories sounding in state law for bad faith dealing and intentional interference with contractual relations, were ultimately determined to be based on section 301 of the National Labor Relations Act; the other two were state claims…
3Cases cited18 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Thermtron Products, Inc. v. HermansdorferSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- James E. Peterson v. Harold Kennedy, Richard A. Berthelsen, and National Football League Players AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- Brian P. Scott v. Machinists Automotive Trades District Lodge No. 190 Of Northern CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- David Koepping v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon Jerry WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Oxley v. Kaiser PermanenteDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024