Legal Opinion

In re M.W.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 2012No. 2011-0215PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as In re M.W., 133 Ohio St.3d 309,

2012-Ohio-4538.] IN RE M.W. [Cite as In re M.W., 133 Ohio St.3d 309,

2012-Ohio-4538.] Juvenile procedure—R.C. 2151.352—The term “proceedings” as used in R.C. 2151.352 means court proceedings, and in that context, a child is statutorily entitled to representation by legal counsel upon the filing of a complaint in juvenile court or upon initial appearance in the juvenile court. (No. 2011-0215—Submitted December 6, 2011—Decided October 3, 2012.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 94737,

2010-Ohio-6362. ____________________ SYLLABUS OF…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. TaylorOhio Supreme Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API