Seibert v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
McFadden, Judge.
Steven Seibert appeals his conviction of aggravated stalking. He argues that the evidence does not support the conviction. We agree and therefore reverse.
On appeal from a criminal conviction,
the evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, and the defendant no longer enjoys the presumption of innocence; moreover, an appellate court does not weigh the evidence or determine witness credibility but only determines whether the evidence is sufficient under the standard of Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979).
(Citation omitted.)…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- State v. BurkeSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
- Cordy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Davidson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- SEIBERT v. ALEXANDER, Jr. Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
- Ordelt v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
- Anthony Allen Oliver v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2022
- Marion D. Calhoun v. Carlotta HarrellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2024