Legal Opinion

Kristeller v. Eisenberg

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided November 1, 1937Published

1Opinion of the Court

The petitioners are the executors under the last will and testament of Emma D. Tanenbaum, deceased. Among the assets of her estate was an option for the purchase of certain premises in the city of Newark described in the petition, which option was held by the Fleissner Realty Company. Suit was brought in this court to compel the company to specifically perform its option and to convey said lands to the decedent's estate, but before final hearing the company agreed to convey the lands pursuant to the terms of the option. Thereupon the defendants, Sadie H. Eisenberg and Morris Eisenberg,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shaw v. G. B. Beaumont Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1917
  2. Caruso v. CarusoNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
  3. Hackensack Trust Co. v. KellyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API