Legal Opinion

Friends of Animals v. U.S. Bureau of Land Management

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 30, 2024No. Civil Action No. 2018-2029Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FRIENDS OF ANIMALS, Plaintiff, v. U.S. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, Civil Action No. 18-2029 (RDM) Defendant, STATE OF UTAH, Defendant-Intervenor. MEMORANDUM OPINION The Wild Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act (“WHA” or the “Act”),

16 U.S.C. § 1331

et seq., seeks to strike an equilibrium between preserving and protecting free-roaming wild horses as “living symbols of the historic and pioneer spirit of the West,”

id.

§ 1331, and ensuring that wild horse populations do not exceed levels that are sustainable for the wild horse herds and the…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Dolly Kyle Browning and Direct Outstanding Creations Corporation v. William Jefferson ClintonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API