Legal Opinion

Reny v. Sneed

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 6, 2007No. A07A1083PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andrews, Presiding Judge.

In the wake of the collapse of an agreement to purchase real property, the erstwhile purchasers, Charles and Mary Reny, sued Charles Gardner, the erstwhile seller, for specific performance. The Renys also sued Gardner’s representative, Lucian Lamar Sneed, for tortious interference with contract. The trial court granted Sneed’s motion for summary judgment on the ground that the Renys and Gardner had failed to form a contract, and the Renys appeal. We find that a genuine issue remains concerning whether a contract was formed, and we therefore reverse.

“Summary judgment…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matjoulis v. Integon General Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  2. W. B. Leedy & Co. v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  3. Robinson v. TateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Costello Industries, Inc. v. Eagle Grooving, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  2. Great Southwest Express Co. v. Great American Insurance Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  3. Great Southwest Express Co. v. Great American Insurance Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API