Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Lewis

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 16, 1985No. 84-101Published

1DissentNebeker, Associate Judge

I begin with some fundamentals. A trial is a search for truth. Application of the exclusionary rule blocks that search and thus the truth. Sometimes the suppression of the truth by use of the rule does not work an injustice because the trial process finds the truth from other admissible evidence. In this case, however, the greatest injustice is done by the use of the rule; an injustice not only to society but also to the hapless victim who must see her assailant go unpunished. Proof of guilt to near certitude is being excluded. Moreover, it is the only proof that Lewis committed this…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API