Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Lane v. Ballinger

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1905No. 5888PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Prater, J., entered August 3, 1905, in favor' of the defendants, dismissing the action, upon sustaining a demurrer to an' application of a guardian for a writ of mandamus to compel the issuance of a warrant for a portion of a judgment in favor of a minor, paid fo* and satisfied by the minor’s attorneys.

1Opinion of the CourtDottbab, J.

On September 28, 1901, Edwin Eskildsen, a minor, suing by his guaxdain ad litem George A. Eskildsen, *25recovered a judgment against the city of Seattle in the superior court of King county, in the sum of $11,000 together with costs taxed at the sum of $25.55. On appeal to this court said judgment was affirmed, and a remittitur was duly filed with the clerk of said superior court. Satisfaction ■ of said judgment against the city was acknowledged by John E. Humphries and E. P. Edsen, the attorneys for plaintiff in the prosecution of the action against the city, on the Pith day of October, 1902,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. FitzpatrickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1872
  2. Cody v. Roane Iron Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Rook v. GodfreyTennessee Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Miles v. KaiglerTennessee Supreme Court · 1836

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Burke v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Garner v. I. E. Schilling Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1937
  3. Clark v. Farmers' State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Southern Ry. Co. v. McKinneyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1921
  5. Lukua v. ManaiaHawaii Supreme Court · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API