Legal Opinion
State v. Narcisse
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided December 11, 2002No. 36,595-KAPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJjPEATROSS, J.
Defendant, Carrol Narcisse, was charged with three counts of obscenity, a violation of La. R.S. 14:106(A). Defendant was tried by a jury and convicted as charged. At sentencing, the State filed an habitual offender bill of information. Defendant was found to be an habitual offender and sentenced to two-year sentences on each count. The trial court ordered the three sentences to be served concurrently with one another, but consecutively to any other hard labor sentence the Defendant was then serving. Defendant now appeals his conviction. For the reasons stated herein, we affirm.
FACTS
Defendant…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. TartSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
- State v. SepulvadoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
- State v. AlloLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
- State v. ArabieLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
- State v. OdomLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Leo Ricardo Barnes v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2013
- State v. HolmesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2004
- in the Interest of D.C. —Colorado Court of Appeals · 2019
- In re D.C.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2019
- State of Louisiana v. Bobby HolmesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2004