Legal Opinion

Bateman Bros. v. Jones

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided March 19, 1931PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The only present inquiry is whether the affidavit of defendant Beakley, as mortgagee in a certain chattel mortgage, satisfies the requirements of our Chattel Mortgage act. 1 Comp. Stat.p. 463 § 4. That statutory requirement is that an affidavit made and subscribed by the holder of the mortgage, his agent or attorney, must be annexed to the mortgage, "stating the consideration of said mortgage and as nearly as possible the amount due and to grow due thereon."

The present hearing is based upon a motion made by complainant — a judgment creditor of the mortgagor — to strike out separate answers of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Howell v. StoneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
  2. Spielman v. KnowlesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1893

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bruck v. the Credit Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  2. Riedinger v. Mack Machine Co., C., Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
  3. Atzingen v. OttolinoNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1938
  4. Fasolo v. Regnu, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  5. In re LauerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API