Nibler v. Coltrane
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion
On Motion for Rehearing.
2Per curiam
On motion for rehearing appellant has re-argued the issues presented in his original brief and he particularly complains of our holdings (1) that the second count of the petition stated a cause of action in quantum meruit for the recovery of the reasonable value of plaintiff’s services; (2) that plaintiff’s evidence was sufficient to make a sub-missible case for the jury; and (3) that the trial court did not err in overruling defendant’s motions for a directed verdict. Appellant insists that “both counts of the petition declare upon an express contract that plaintiff…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Laughlin v. Boatmen's National BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1945
- Basman v. FrankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- Pflanz v. PflanzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1944
- State ex rel. Spaulding v. PetersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
- Green v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.