Legal Opinion

State v. Finger.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 25, 1902PublishedCited by 5 opinions

INDICTMENT of Clarence Einger, .beard by Judge H. R. S barbudo and a. jury, at April Term, 19'02, of tbe Superior fJourt of Lincoln County. From a verdict of guilty and judgment tbereon, tbe defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

Tbe defendant was convicted of assault with intent to commit rape upon Letbe Wise, a child under ten years of age. After an examination of the child, who was tendered as a witness, as to- her capacity to testify, his Honor found that she was of sufficient intelligence, and she was allowed to give testimony, over the defendant’s objection and exception. It was a matter in the discretion of his Honor, and we can not review his ruling in this Court. State v. Manuel, 64 N. C., 601; State v. Edwards, 79 N. C., 648. The defendant’s counsel offered to prove that the Weaver .family ate with negroes…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. . ManuelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870
  2. State v. . EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lanier v. . BryanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  2. State v. . CaldwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  3. State v. . PittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. State v. Mehaffey.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  5. State v. Mehaffey.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API