Legal Opinion

Wieland v. Cedar Rapids & Iowa City Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 4, 1951No. 47815PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

The only issue involved here is alleged mutual mistake of -fact in the making of a settlement about two months *584after the personal injury occurred. The good faith of the settlement is not assailed in pleading, proof or argument. Defendant pleaded it and by appropriate pleading and motions questioned the sufficiency of the evidence of mutual mistake to justify submission of that issue to the jury. There was a verdict for $648 upon which judgment was entered with permission to defendant to have the amount paid in settlement applied in partial payment. Defendant appeals.

The injury occurred…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Reddington v. RafterySupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  2. Seymour v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  3. Jordan v. Brady Transfer & Storage Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1939
  4. Pahl v. Tri-City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1921

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Haller v. WallisWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Reed v. HarveySupreme Court of Iowa · 1961
  3. Barnard v. Cedar Rapids City Cab Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1965
  4. Pathology Consultants v. GrattonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  5. Bakke v. BakkeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API