Legal Opinion

People v. Wright

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 16, 2000No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court properly denied defendant’s motion to suppress identification testimony. The People met their initial burden of establishing that the conduct of the police was reasonable and that the photo array was not unduly suggestive, and defendant failed to meet his “ultimate burden of proving that the procedure was unduly suggestive” (People v Chipp, 75 NY2d 327, 335, cert denied 498 US 833; see, People v Bell, 265 AD2d 813). The conviction is supported by legally sufficient evidence and the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence (see,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. ChippNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. People v. GrantonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. People v. BellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. People v. KingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. ThomasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. People v. FooteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. People v. GonzalezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API