Legal Opinion

Gulick v. Gulick

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 9, 1971PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

113 N.J. Super. 366 (1971)

273 A.2d 792

JUNE C. GULICK, PLAINTIFF,

v.

JOHN GULICK, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.

Decided February 9, 1971.

Mrs. Regina H. Meredith argued the motion for plaintiff (Messrs. Meredith, Meredith and Chase, attorneys).

Mr. Daniel A. O'Donnell, Jr. argued the motion for defendant (Messrs. McLaughlin, Dawes & Abbotts, attorneys).

FRITZ, J.S.C.

Plaintiff, by motion, seeks to modify provisions of a judgment nisi for divorce with respect to support provisions and provisions made therein for respective claims of dependency in connection with federal…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Martindell v. MartindellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  2. Turi v. TuriNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  3. Ramhorst v. RamhorstSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1946
  4. Boorstein v. BoorsteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1948
  5. Cohen v. CohenNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1937

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lepis v. LepisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  2. Garlinger v. GarlingerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
  3. Skillman v. SkillmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
  4. Barrie v. BarrieNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  5. Drobney v. DrobneyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API