Legal Opinion
Pennie & Edmonds v. Austad Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 15, 1988No. 88 Civ. 0012 (KC)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
CONBOY, District Judge:
This is an action for payment of legal fees incurred. Plaintiff is a partnership organized and existing under the laws of the State of New York. Affidavit of Frank F. Scheck, executed Feb. 17, 1988, at para. 1. Defendant is a closely-held family-owned corporation incorporated under the laws of the State of South Dakota. Affidavit of Oscar Austad, executed Jan. 21, 1988, at para. 7. The action is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 12(b)(2) for lack of personal jurisdiction.
FACTS
In 1982, Anthony…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Chevron Corp. v. DonzigerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Fischbarg v. DoucetAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007