Legal Opinion

Grant v. Consolidated Underwriters

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 26, 1947No. 7127PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a compensation suit in which plaintiff claims to have been injured while in the employ of one Joe McAllister (or McCallister), who, according to the allegations of the petition, was either a sub-contractor of Gross and Janes Tie Company, or an independent contractor. The defendant is the insurer for Gross and Janes Tie Company.

Defendant's answer denied that plaintiff was ever in the employ of Gross and Janes Tie Company, or that of any contractor or sub-contractor of said Company.

There is no dispute as to the facts with reference to the injury and the sole question involved herein is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Seabury v. Arkansas Natural Gas CorporationSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
  2. Carter v. Colfax Lumber & Creosoting Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. Owers v. Louisiana Long Leaf Lumber Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Hatch v. Industrial Lumber Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Wilson v. RobertsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1940

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Stevens v. MitchellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
  2. Garner v. Southern Pulpwood InsuranceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Jones v. O. C. Hennessy, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. De Bose v. KellyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Phillips v. Consolidated UnderwritersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API